About OBS
OBS Members
Publications
What's New
Survey Projects
Biodiversity in Ohio
Academic Biologists
Links |
 |
Ohio
Biological Survey
Small Grants Program
[for Institutional or Individual Members]
PURPOSE
The Ohio Biological Survey
offers small grant programs to support work which occurs partially or
wholly in Ohio, and that promotes the Survey's objectives. The Survey
offers this support to individual members and institutional/corporate
members from monies derived from up to one-half of their respective
dues.
QUALIFICATIONS
Applicants for individual
small grants must be current individual members of the Survey for the
year preceding and for the year during the Spring award period.
Applicants for institutional/ corporate small
grants must be active employees or members of the member institution or
corporation.
SOLICITATION OF PROPOSALS
The Ohio Biological Survey
shall announce the availability of both categories of grants through
either a general announcement to members or through publication in BioOhio.
Proposals should be received by the Survey on or before 1 February of
each granting year.
OBJECTIVES OF THE OHIO
BIOLOGICAL SURVEY
- To secure accurate and
detailed information concerning the occurrence, distribution, and
ecology of the plants and animals in Ohio for the people in general and
for those engaged in education, conservation, and science in
particular.
- To collect, identify,
describe, and distribute biological materials that may be of service in
education and research.
- To publish the scientific
results of biological surveys and scientific studies on the taxonomy,
distribution, and ecology of plants and animals in Ohio, or in a wider
geographical area of which Ohio is an integral part.
top
RULES AND GUIDELINES
- Grant requests can be made
for up to $250 and up to $500 for individual and institutional small
grants, respectively.
- Recipients are not eligible
to receive both individual and institutional small grants in the same
year.
- One third of the monies
available for institutional / corporate small grants will be set aside
for qualified proposals from colleges and other institutions without
graduate students. If more qualified proposals exist from these smaller
institutions than can be funded, then the unfunded proposals will be
considered with those from larger institutions. If there is an
insufficient number of qualified proposals from these smaller
institutions, then the remaining set-aside monies will be added to that
available for the larger institutions.
- All proposals must be typed
(single spaced) and received by the Survey on or before 1 February of
each granting year.
- Proposals should be
submitted on the form provided by the Ohio Biological Survey.
- Review and scoring of all
proposals will be performed by the Survey's Executive Committee. The
Director and the Survey staff will function to inform the membership
about the small grants program, to dispense monies to successful
awardees, to organize presentation of interim reports at the annual
Advisory Board meeting, and to receive and house final reports or
publications.
- If the Director, upon
receipt of the proposals, finds that two or more institutional
applicants are proposing essentially the same work, the respective
applicants will be alerted of this fact in the hope that the work can
be done cooperatively. This does not necessarily imply a reduction in
funding.
- For institutional awardees,
an oral or written interim report must be delivered by the applicant(s)
or their designee during the annual Ohio Biological Survey Advisory
Board meeting (1st Saturday in November). A final written report by
individual and institutional awardees is due in the Survey office by 31
March of the following year.
- Publications, public and
private presentations, and other products derived from work funded by
the Survey must include acknowledgment of the Survey.
top
EVALUATION CRITERIA
- How does the proposed work
pertain to the objectives of the Survey?
[ score 1 (low) to 5 (high); weight = 40% ]
- How does the proposed work
rank in relation to Survey priorities?
[ 5 = surveys and distributions; 4 = taxonomy and collection work;
3 = ecology- population studies; 3 = ecology- life history studies;
3 = ecology - conservation; weight = 30% ]
- How does the proposed work
rank in relation to other proposals of similar priority?
[ score 1 (low) to 5 (high); weight = 20% ]
-
How does
the proposed work meet the following subcriteria:
[ score 1 (low) to 5
(high); weight = 10% ]
- the proposed work can be
completed within a reasonable time frame;
- necessary collection
permits are in-hand or in-processing (if applicable);
- the applicant has given
some indication of previous experience or aptitude for the proposed
work (if applicable, primarily institutional/corporate grants).
- the applicant has
satisfactorily completed work on previous Survey grants (if
applicable); and,
- the proposed work will
result in a Survey publication or a publication in
a refereed journal.
In case of ties for the
last grant, preference will be given to proposals (1) which continue or
follow-up work successfully completed during previous grant periods,
(2) which are from institutions with no
funded proposals, and (3) which are part of funding requests to one or
more other sources. In the latter case, proof must be provided that
complete funding has been secured before Survey funds are actually
transferred.
top
|